Referral Sites/URLs
Hello,
I was wondering if there are any help documents that get deeper into the understanding of the referrals. I am confused about my results.
I ran a report on our website (Landing Site A) and can see the referrals. But, there was a red flag for us there because a site (referral site) that should have extremely high referrals to Landing Site A was super low.
I then ran a report with specific include filter to try to grab URL information from the referral site. This report showed more referrals to Landing Site A. I am wondering why this would happen. Which report is accurate?
You can see that our referral site isn't even in the top 22.
Landing Site A Top Referring Sites example data
1 http://www.google.com 102,718
2 No Referrer 47,607
3 http://www.extension.purdue.edu 16,488
4 http://www.google.co.in 6,114
5 http://www.google.ca 5,884
6 http://www.bing.com 5,427
7 http://www.google.co.uk 4,251
8 http://www.google.com.ph 3,768
9 http://www.google.com.au 2,688
10 http://www.google.com.my 1,387
11 http://r.search.yahoo.com 1,346
12 http://www.google.co.za 1,338
13 http://www.ces.purdue.edu 1,258
14 http://www.google.com.mx 952
15 http://www.google.com.pk 936
16 http://www.google.co.th 675
17 http://www.google.co.nz 636
18 http://www.google.com.ng 576
19 http://www.google.ie 564
20 http://www.google.com.eg 530
21 http://www.google.es 470
22 http://www.google.com.vn 463
Now using include referrer filters
1 http://mdc.itap.purdue.edu 808 - Referral Site
2 http://translate.googleusercontent.com 7
3 http://www.extension.purdue.edu 6
4 http://www.edustore.purdue.edu 2
5 http://edustore.purdue.edu 2
Thank you,
Gina
I was wondering if there are any help documents that get deeper into the understanding of the referrals. I am confused about my results.
I ran a report on our website (Landing Site A) and can see the referrals. But, there was a red flag for us there because a site (referral site) that should have extremely high referrals to Landing Site A was super low.
I then ran a report with specific include filter to try to grab URL information from the referral site. This report showed more referrals to Landing Site A. I am wondering why this would happen. Which report is accurate?
You can see that our referral site isn't even in the top 22.
Landing Site A Top Referring Sites example data
1 http://www.google.com 102,718
2 No Referrer 47,607
3 http://www.extension.purdue.edu 16,488
4 http://www.google.co.in 6,114
5 http://www.google.ca 5,884
6 http://www.bing.com 5,427
7 http://www.google.co.uk 4,251
8 http://www.google.com.ph 3,768
9 http://www.google.com.au 2,688
10 http://www.google.com.my 1,387
11 http://r.search.yahoo.com 1,346
12 http://www.google.co.za 1,338
13 http://www.ces.purdue.edu 1,258
14 http://www.google.com.mx 952
15 http://www.google.com.pk 936
16 http://www.google.co.th 675
17 http://www.google.co.nz 636
18 http://www.google.com.ng 576
19 http://www.google.ie 564
20 http://www.google.com.eg 530
21 http://www.google.es 470
22 http://www.google.com.vn 463
Now using include referrer filters
1 http://mdc.itap.purdue.edu 808 - Referral Site
2 http://translate.googleusercontent.com 7
3 http://www.extension.purdue.edu 6
4 http://www.edustore.purdue.edu 2
5 http://edustore.purdue.edu 2
Thank you,
Gina
It explains why in the second case number of visitors shown is higher. BTW if you analyze hits for the referrer site in the same report (e.g. if you have common logs for both sites), in most cases number of the referrers you expect should be be shown as almost zero, because the program considers all these requests to be requests from the same site. As visitors first visit pages on the referrer site, and only then follow to the landing page, referrers to the first viewed page on the referring site will be shown instead of URL with link to the landing page. If it is indeed the case, you can either use the filter as you did, or you can add the landing page to the list of tracked files in Profile Properties > Tracking to view all direct referrers to it from all visitors not depending on their first viewed pages.